Man who claimed race was factor during DWI trial goes to jail
NORWICH – An Oxford man who brought up the issue of race at his DWI felony trial in February appeared in court last week as his lawyer said his client was pulled over 38 times in 12 months and only issued two tickets.
Deliberating for a little over an hour on Feb. 18, a jury found 29-year-old Thomas Toomer II not guilty of felony driving while intoxicated, but guilty of driving while ability impaired, a misdemeanor. It was a ruling his attorney, Jeffrey G. Leibo of Syracuse, described as a victory for the defense following the verdict.
“The jury got to see that I was definitely not intoxicated. They saw me angry, but they didn’t believe I was intoxicated and that’s what matters,” said Toomer, who is an African American.
The anger the jury saw was shown in a one hour and 27-minute surveillance video of the Norwich Police Station’s booking room, where Toomer directed pleas, obscenities and accusations of racial bias toward the arresting officers.
Toomer was arrested May 7 along Park Street in Norwich and was traveling with a passenger so intoxicated police were unable to communicate with him and get his name. Toomer was arrested for DWI and taken to the Norwich Police Station for processing.
Chained to the floor and seated in a chair for most of the video, Toomer is seen insulting and begging with officers at different points to contact his attorney for more than 30 minutes. During that time, police are seen filing paper work, attempting to find his lawyer’s phone number and trying to explain Toomer’s rights.
The video takes place between 2 and 3:30 a.m., and during that time police placed three calls in an attempt to connect Toomer to the offices of his lawyer. In the video, Toomer refuses to acknowledge the calls because neither of his attorneys were available; however lawyers from their offices were contacted by phone and did speak with him.
Police asked Toomer a number of times in the video if he would consent to a breath test. Toomer refuses to answer the question without having a lawyer present and eventually police automatically entered a refusal into their paperwork in accordance with New York State law over his objection.
Also in the video, Toomer can be heard several times declaring he is not intoxicated, accusing officers of arresting him because he’s “black” and threatening to sue the police department.
All three officers called to testify in the case said Toomer appeared intoxicated, citing his slurred speech, odor and blood-shot eyes. However, when cross-examined by Leibo, two of the officers both noted that Toomer’s speech does not appear to be slurred in the surveillance video.
During the trial, Toomer told the court he had been pulled over earlier that same day by another law enforcement agency while traveling along State Highway 12 between Oxford and Norwich. He said he was released without receiving any tickets and was later pulled over and charged with DWI in the city.
District Attorney Joseph McBride told the court last week that Toomer had eight prior arrests, including other drinking and driving convictions, and that he used the knowledge and familiarity gained through those crimes to purposefully confuse and delay the police investigation.
McBride said Toomer’s criminal record included assault, DWI, criminal possession of a weapon and other offenses.
“This defendant’s goal from the onset of this incident was to intentionally impede and delay police attempts to process him because he knows that if he had blown into that machine, we wouldn’t be here in court today,” McBride told the jury.
Leibo told the court that the “pattern” of police targeting his client was “nothing short of harassment.”
McBride sought the maximum possible sentence asking for 180 days in local jail for the misdemeanor conviction. Leibo asked for his client to be released with time served.
Returning to court for sentencing, County Court Judge W. Howard Sullivan asked Toomer if he had any words of apology in regards to his conduct in the video and to the officers, who the judge noted appeared “very professional” in the video.
“I would like to apologize to the court for my actions on the video. It’s not me – I’m a smart person and all I want is to continue my life as an upstanding person in my community. I know police have a really hard job; it’s stressful. It’s sad how one bad apple can ruin the bunch, but I believe I was treated inappropriately on the night in question, sir,” Toomer told the judge.
Sullivan said he still thought Toomer showed nothing but “contempt for police and the justice system” in his actions on the tape.
“In my opinion, you need to pay for your disrespect,” he said.
Sullivan ordered a 120-day sentence and $1,395 in surcharges and fines.
Deliberating for a little over an hour on Feb. 18, a jury found 29-year-old Thomas Toomer II not guilty of felony driving while intoxicated, but guilty of driving while ability impaired, a misdemeanor. It was a ruling his attorney, Jeffrey G. Leibo of Syracuse, described as a victory for the defense following the verdict.
“The jury got to see that I was definitely not intoxicated. They saw me angry, but they didn’t believe I was intoxicated and that’s what matters,” said Toomer, who is an African American.
The anger the jury saw was shown in a one hour and 27-minute surveillance video of the Norwich Police Station’s booking room, where Toomer directed pleas, obscenities and accusations of racial bias toward the arresting officers.
Toomer was arrested May 7 along Park Street in Norwich and was traveling with a passenger so intoxicated police were unable to communicate with him and get his name. Toomer was arrested for DWI and taken to the Norwich Police Station for processing.
Chained to the floor and seated in a chair for most of the video, Toomer is seen insulting and begging with officers at different points to contact his attorney for more than 30 minutes. During that time, police are seen filing paper work, attempting to find his lawyer’s phone number and trying to explain Toomer’s rights.
The video takes place between 2 and 3:30 a.m., and during that time police placed three calls in an attempt to connect Toomer to the offices of his lawyer. In the video, Toomer refuses to acknowledge the calls because neither of his attorneys were available; however lawyers from their offices were contacted by phone and did speak with him.
Police asked Toomer a number of times in the video if he would consent to a breath test. Toomer refuses to answer the question without having a lawyer present and eventually police automatically entered a refusal into their paperwork in accordance with New York State law over his objection.
Also in the video, Toomer can be heard several times declaring he is not intoxicated, accusing officers of arresting him because he’s “black” and threatening to sue the police department.
All three officers called to testify in the case said Toomer appeared intoxicated, citing his slurred speech, odor and blood-shot eyes. However, when cross-examined by Leibo, two of the officers both noted that Toomer’s speech does not appear to be slurred in the surveillance video.
During the trial, Toomer told the court he had been pulled over earlier that same day by another law enforcement agency while traveling along State Highway 12 between Oxford and Norwich. He said he was released without receiving any tickets and was later pulled over and charged with DWI in the city.
District Attorney Joseph McBride told the court last week that Toomer had eight prior arrests, including other drinking and driving convictions, and that he used the knowledge and familiarity gained through those crimes to purposefully confuse and delay the police investigation.
McBride said Toomer’s criminal record included assault, DWI, criminal possession of a weapon and other offenses.
“This defendant’s goal from the onset of this incident was to intentionally impede and delay police attempts to process him because he knows that if he had blown into that machine, we wouldn’t be here in court today,” McBride told the jury.
Leibo told the court that the “pattern” of police targeting his client was “nothing short of harassment.”
McBride sought the maximum possible sentence asking for 180 days in local jail for the misdemeanor conviction. Leibo asked for his client to be released with time served.
Returning to court for sentencing, County Court Judge W. Howard Sullivan asked Toomer if he had any words of apology in regards to his conduct in the video and to the officers, who the judge noted appeared “very professional” in the video.
“I would like to apologize to the court for my actions on the video. It’s not me – I’m a smart person and all I want is to continue my life as an upstanding person in my community. I know police have a really hard job; it’s stressful. It’s sad how one bad apple can ruin the bunch, but I believe I was treated inappropriately on the night in question, sir,” Toomer told the judge.
Sullivan said he still thought Toomer showed nothing but “contempt for police and the justice system” in his actions on the tape.
“In my opinion, you need to pay for your disrespect,” he said.
Sullivan ordered a 120-day sentence and $1,395 in surcharges and fines.
dived wound factual legitimately delightful goodness fit rat some lopsidedly far when.
Slung alongside jeepers hypnotic legitimately some iguana this agreeably triumphant pointedly far
jeepers unscrupulous anteater attentive noiseless put less greyhound prior stiff ferret unbearably cracked oh.
So sparing more goose caribou wailed went conveniently burned the the the and that save that adroit gosh and sparing armadillo grew some overtook that magnificently that
Circuitous gull and messily squirrel on that banally assenting nobly some much rakishly goodness that the darn abject hello left because unaccountably spluttered unlike a aurally since contritely thanks