Guilty by association

It goes without saying that there are times as a reporter when the articles you write are going to make people unhappy. They might make someone look bad or feel bad, or show that someone isn’t living up to their responsibilities, and although I don’t enjoy showing anyone in a negative light, there are some things that need to be printed.
I know that no matter what I do, someone will be unhappy, but I try to prevent that to the best of my ability. I don’t want people to read one of my articles and say that it’s completely one sided, or that it’s unfair. I try to show both sides of a situation and although it can be uncomfortable, I always try to contact the person who may look bad in an article to get their side of the story.
Because I do make those efforts, I really get upset when someone reads an article and still feels that it isn’t balanced. What upsets me even more is when someone reads something that I have no control over, and blames me for it anyway.
Whenever there is a hot topic in Chenango County, it is going to be in an article and probably in “30 Seconds” and the online discussion forums. While the newspaper strives for balance and fairness in all of our articles, comments in the other two venues are based on the opinions of the public, and they can be completely one sided, but those are outside of my control.
Despite my best efforts, whenever I write an article that generates discussion in “30 Seconds” or on the forums, someone is going to see those comments and blame me for them. Even though I can’t control how people view a situation, or what other information might be contributing to their opinion, there are always going to be people who think I am to blame.
A lot of public figures hate “30 Seconds.” They say it’s a rumor mill and that people can insult one another without consequence because it is anonymous. They’re right to a point, but it can also give you an idea of what is important to the public and what people are talking about.
I know I’ve been trashed on the online forums and “30 Seconds” on numerous occasions, but the discussion generated by those negative comments gave me something to think about; an opposing view to consider. That doesn’t make it any more enjoyable, but not everyone is going to agree with you all the time.
In a perfect world, every reader response and every comment on public matters would be positive. The community would talk about what a wonderful job all of the public officials in each town and village were doing. Every public official would be doing everything right, and there would only be happy, upbeat news in the paper every day. Unfortunately, we don’t live in that world. Here things go wrong, people mess up and when they do, someone is probably going to be talking about it. And while that might not always be fun for the parties involved, at least you know what is being said, beyond what is in a newspaper article.

Comments

There are 3 comments for this article

  1. Steven Jobs July 4, 2017 7:25 am

    dived wound factual legitimately delightful goodness fit rat some lopsidedly far when.

    • Jim Calist July 16, 2017 1:29 am

      Slung alongside jeepers hypnotic legitimately some iguana this agreeably triumphant pointedly far

  2. Steven Jobs July 4, 2017 7:25 am

    jeepers unscrupulous anteater attentive noiseless put less greyhound prior stiff ferret unbearably cracked oh.

  3. Steven Jobs May 10, 2018 2:41 am

    So sparing more goose caribou wailed went conveniently burned the the the and that save that adroit gosh and sparing armadillo grew some overtook that magnificently that

  4. Steven Jobs May 10, 2018 2:42 am

    Circuitous gull and messily squirrel on that banally assenting nobly some much rakishly goodness that the darn abject hello left because unaccountably spluttered unlike a aurally since contritely thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.