Oxford wastewater treatment plant on “borrowed time”
OXFORD – An out of service piece of equipment at Oxford’s wastewater treatment plant won’t have an immediate impact on residents, but it may force the village’s hand in overhauling the South Canal Street facility which has been processing the municipality’s sewage for the last two decades.
“They were on borrowed time,” reported Village of Oxford Mayor Terry Stark, explaining that the useful life for much of the equipment in use at the facility, which was constructed between 1988 and 1989, is 20 years.
On Sept. 18, that time ran out for one of the plant’s two Rotating Biological Contactors (RBCs), when the shaft broke on the piece of equipment. Since that time, the facility has been operating using the one remaining unit.
According to Stark, the RBCs play a crucial role in removing pollutants from the waste water processed by the plant. After passing through the facility’s primary clarifier, the effluent treated at the plant passes through at least one of the RBCs, where closely spaced pie-shaped media disks, laden with microorganisms, are affixed to a long shaft. As the shaft rotates and the media passes through the waste water, the “bugs” help break down the sewage by absorbing organic material. The waste water is then passed through a second clarifier and a chlorine contact tank before being expelled into the Chenango River.
While village residents will not see any interruption in service due to the issue, it brings the need for a long-term plan for continued use of the wastewater treatment plant to the forefront.
“We think it makes more sense to look at the whole picture,” said Stark, who reported that he and the members of the waste water commission had already been working for the better part of the last year on developing a plan for the aging facility prior to the latest problem with the RBC. For the broken shaft is not the first of the issues the village has had with the equipment as it nears the end of its useful life. The mayor estimated that over the last 2 to 3 years Oxford has invested roughly $12,000 in each of the two units in order to replace media and make repairs to the shafts and gear reducers.
“The hope was that by repairing those items, we’d get a lot more time,” he said.
This time, however, the RBC unit will require more than just a few thousand dollars worth of repairs. Returning it to operation could cost the village as much as $100,000, Stark said, by the time the expense of a new shaft, gear reducer and media, which run upwards of $1,000 per wedge, are added up. Replacing the entire RBC would cost between $150,000 and $180,000 and take three to five months, according to preliminary price quotes he has received.
But just replacing one RBC won’t address the larger overlying issue, according to Stark.
“We’re in fear that the other one may go down,” he explained. And there is the age of the other equipment in use at the facility to consider as well.
“If we completely do a re-capitalization project, then it makes sense to go for a bigger project,” Stark said, speculating on whether, with the availability of grants and low or no-interest loans, it may be more financially viable for the village to look at replacing everything in one fell swoop.
Time is of the essence as Stark, the Wastewater Commission and the village board evaluate their options, because there is another ramification of the RBC being non-operational: Based on the Department of Environmental Conservation permit the village has to operate the facility, it must closely monitor the levels of various compounds contained in the water released into the Chenango. They could face hefty fines if they fail to comply with this criteria.
Based on daily samples taken at the plant, Stark said he believes it is quite possible they will be deemed out of compliance if not for September – when both RBCs were operational for the first 18 days of the month – then certainly for October, when they have been operating on the sole remaining unit. His hope, he said, is that the DEC will take into account the fact that the village is working diligently to rectify the situation.
“We would like to have a plan approved and ready to execute certainly by Christmas at the latest,” he said.
“They were on borrowed time,” reported Village of Oxford Mayor Terry Stark, explaining that the useful life for much of the equipment in use at the facility, which was constructed between 1988 and 1989, is 20 years.
On Sept. 18, that time ran out for one of the plant’s two Rotating Biological Contactors (RBCs), when the shaft broke on the piece of equipment. Since that time, the facility has been operating using the one remaining unit.
According to Stark, the RBCs play a crucial role in removing pollutants from the waste water processed by the plant. After passing through the facility’s primary clarifier, the effluent treated at the plant passes through at least one of the RBCs, where closely spaced pie-shaped media disks, laden with microorganisms, are affixed to a long shaft. As the shaft rotates and the media passes through the waste water, the “bugs” help break down the sewage by absorbing organic material. The waste water is then passed through a second clarifier and a chlorine contact tank before being expelled into the Chenango River.
While village residents will not see any interruption in service due to the issue, it brings the need for a long-term plan for continued use of the wastewater treatment plant to the forefront.
“We think it makes more sense to look at the whole picture,” said Stark, who reported that he and the members of the waste water commission had already been working for the better part of the last year on developing a plan for the aging facility prior to the latest problem with the RBC. For the broken shaft is not the first of the issues the village has had with the equipment as it nears the end of its useful life. The mayor estimated that over the last 2 to 3 years Oxford has invested roughly $12,000 in each of the two units in order to replace media and make repairs to the shafts and gear reducers.
“The hope was that by repairing those items, we’d get a lot more time,” he said.
This time, however, the RBC unit will require more than just a few thousand dollars worth of repairs. Returning it to operation could cost the village as much as $100,000, Stark said, by the time the expense of a new shaft, gear reducer and media, which run upwards of $1,000 per wedge, are added up. Replacing the entire RBC would cost between $150,000 and $180,000 and take three to five months, according to preliminary price quotes he has received.
But just replacing one RBC won’t address the larger overlying issue, according to Stark.
“We’re in fear that the other one may go down,” he explained. And there is the age of the other equipment in use at the facility to consider as well.
“If we completely do a re-capitalization project, then it makes sense to go for a bigger project,” Stark said, speculating on whether, with the availability of grants and low or no-interest loans, it may be more financially viable for the village to look at replacing everything in one fell swoop.
Time is of the essence as Stark, the Wastewater Commission and the village board evaluate their options, because there is another ramification of the RBC being non-operational: Based on the Department of Environmental Conservation permit the village has to operate the facility, it must closely monitor the levels of various compounds contained in the water released into the Chenango. They could face hefty fines if they fail to comply with this criteria.
Based on daily samples taken at the plant, Stark said he believes it is quite possible they will be deemed out of compliance if not for September – when both RBCs were operational for the first 18 days of the month – then certainly for October, when they have been operating on the sole remaining unit. His hope, he said, is that the DEC will take into account the fact that the village is working diligently to rectify the situation.
“We would like to have a plan approved and ready to execute certainly by Christmas at the latest,” he said.
dived wound factual legitimately delightful goodness fit rat some lopsidedly far when.
Slung alongside jeepers hypnotic legitimately some iguana this agreeably triumphant pointedly far
jeepers unscrupulous anteater attentive noiseless put less greyhound prior stiff ferret unbearably cracked oh.
So sparing more goose caribou wailed went conveniently burned the the the and that save that adroit gosh and sparing armadillo grew some overtook that magnificently that
Circuitous gull and messily squirrel on that banally assenting nobly some much rakishly goodness that the darn abject hello left because unaccountably spluttered unlike a aurally since contritely thanks