Why are stand hunters seeing fewer deer?

With the bowhunting season in full swing, it’s noteworthy that the vast majority of bowhunters opt to do their hunting from tree stands. There are several advantages to doing so – being higher makes the hunter less noticeable to approaching deer; the height also keeps any human scent higher so it may drift above a deer that’s close by; and the hunter can get away with a bit more movement without the deer spotting it. But there’s becoming a downside to this as well.
Blame it on hunters that hunt both the archery and the gun seasons from tree stands, or on all the TV deer hunting shows that usually focus primarily on both bow and gun hunting being done from tree stands (and normally seeing lots of bucks and almost always being successful), or maybe on the aging hunter group as a whole, who just don’t like to walk as much as they use to. However, with so many gun hunters now opting to sit for hours in tree stands, rather than still-hunt, fewer deer are being seen because they can cease moving (bed down) for a good portion of the day without being disturbed by hunter movement.
Other than the peak deer movement times of just after dawn and just prior to dusk, about the only other period some deer will be moving is around noontime, as many hunters leave the woods to have lunch or take a break from hunting. What this is translating to in recent years is that gun hunters are seeing fewer deer when they’re on watch. It’s quite simple really … with far fewer hunters on the move in the woods, there are far fewer deer being forced to move. Oh, a few hunters still practice limited deer drives drives, but even that practice has declined in recent years as less land has become accessible to hunting.
The lament given by many hunters that choose to sit a watch has always been “if I move deer, the chances are, I’ll just push them to other hunters.” Well yes, that can happen, especially when the hunter is moving too fast, making too much noise, and doesn’t keep tabs on the wind or air thermal direction. True still-hunting has unfortunately become somewhat of a lost art. And with the number of deer hunters in the woods declining, the risk of moving a deer to another hunter has declined.
What many regular deer season hunters may not have discovered yet is there are more similarities between sitting on a watch and still-hunting than meets the eye. Done right, still-hunting is not walking, but rather carefully sneaking and stopping often to scan for unalerted deer. Physically, the hunter doesn’t have to be an Olympic speed-walking champion to successfully still-hunt. Each hunter can move at whatever speed is the most comfortable. Some take as few as a half dozen steps before stopping. Others may move for a predetermined time span, such as perhaps an estimated 15-30 seconds, then stop and scan.
The woods are not a totally silent ecosystem. There are assorted noises that deer hear on a regular basis – grey and red squirrels, wild turkeys and other deer are often moving about and making noise when they do – but deer have learned to differentiate between the natural noises they make and the unnatural noises, such as a human walking makes. I know a few still-hunters who deer hunt while using a diaphragm turkey call and periodically make sounds like a foraging turkey would. But they also scan the woods more than they move.
Any veteran hunter can attest to sound being a good indicator of what animals are moving nearby. How often have we been alerted when a squirrel scurries in the leaves as it forages, or hearing soft yelps and leaf rustling as wild turkeys approach? We can also readily hear an approaching hunter, as the often steady footfall cadence foretells of his movement. A deer, on the other hand, seldom walks at a steady pace but rather a few steps and then stops, sometimes for several minutes before moving again. Does that hint at how a proper still-hunt cadence should be done? You bet.
Even if there’s snow covering the ground, and the still-hunter is more exposed against the white background, but so are the deer. A deer’s eyesight in daylight is less acute than ours, but what it usually detects first is movement. So a distant hunter that’s moving downwind at the same pace as a deer would move (stopping often) is far less apt to cause alarm. And ever since scoped rifles became legal for our regular season, the effective range a hunter may shoot accurately once he’s positively identified the target and background area has increased.
Although wearing adequate hunter orange when deer hunting during the non-archery seasons goes without saying, it’s applicable to both tree standers and still-hunters. The color is very visible to humans but not to deer. Studies have shown the one color deer can readily see is blue, so it’s not a bad idea to forgo wearing blue jeans when hunting deer. Also choose hunting clothing made of a fabric that’s quiet whenever you move or whenever you brush against a branch, briar or whatever. The sound of a branch or briar scraping against clothing is a dead giveaway to deer that something representing danger is approaching.
I’m not suggesting that every gun hunter abandon their tree stands and become still-hunters, but if you’ve been on watch for hours and haven’t seen deer, it’s another tactic that can result in putting venison in the freezer this fall.

Comments

There are 3 comments for this article

  1. Steven Jobs July 4, 2017 7:25 am

    dived wound factual legitimately delightful goodness fit rat some lopsidedly far when.

    • Jim Calist July 16, 2017 1:29 am

      Slung alongside jeepers hypnotic legitimately some iguana this agreeably triumphant pointedly far

  2. Steven Jobs July 4, 2017 7:25 am

    jeepers unscrupulous anteater attentive noiseless put less greyhound prior stiff ferret unbearably cracked oh.

  3. Steven Jobs May 10, 2018 2:41 am

    So sparing more goose caribou wailed went conveniently burned the the the and that save that adroit gosh and sparing armadillo grew some overtook that magnificently that

  4. Steven Jobs May 10, 2018 2:42 am

    Circuitous gull and messily squirrel on that banally assenting nobly some much rakishly goodness that the darn abject hello left because unaccountably spluttered unlike a aurally since contritely thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.