State and feds take drastic measures to reduce geese numbers
A recent news piece reported in the NY Times claimed that the DEC or others (assumedly the US Fish & Wildlife Service) planned to capture, euthanize and bury 170,000 resident geese to achieve the statewide population goal of 85,000 birds. Since an overpopulation of resident, non-migrating geese has been an ongoing problem throughout the state, that story took on a life of its own, despite not be entirely correct.
In spring 2009, following the US Airways Flight 1549 incident, DEC cooperated with federal and local officials to develop an action plan to reduce the number of resident Canada geese that posed a hazard to aviation safety in the New York metropolitan area. U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Wildlife Services program accepted lead responsibility for developing and implementing a specific work plan to reduce the number of geese around JFK and LaGuardia airports. That work plan was designed to be more aggressive, and more effective, than the variety of non-lethal measures that had been used at both airports for many years.
It is the USDA work plan, not the flyway management plan, which describes the goose removal program that occurred in New York City in 2009 and 2010. The USDA work plan cited the Atlantic Flyway plan, and the population goal for New York, as part of their determination that the actions called for were consistent with current management goals and policies of DEC and other wildlife agencies. To reiterate, there are absolutely no plans by DEC or others to capture, euthanize and bury 170,000 resident geese to achieve the statewide population goal of 85,000.
As a writer and editor I travelled often to Canada, including the Ungava Peninsula in northern Quebec, which is the primary spring nesting grounds for Eastern Flyway geese. Two successive poor nesting seasons there caused the USFWS and DEC to drastically reduce our goose hunting seasons and limits. However, a string of milder winter seasons in New York and other eastern states resulted in a drastic increase in non-migrating Canada geese that basically became year-round residents, including nesting and gosling propagation, a factor that was notable when surveying the usual Ungava spring nesting grounds, where the numbers were declining. Couple these with reduced flyway counts due to the Ungava nesting success decline, and geese populations increased far faster than expected, helped along by the more strict harvesting regulations.
As many are aware, the overabundant geese have caused problems, grazing and fouling parks and golf courses, contaminating water supply reservoirs with their droppings. In some ways the problems they cause are similar to those of the increase in cormorants that have required similar reduction management. Like a few others, I’d noted the changes in our geese habits and patterns and wrote about them in this column several years ago. But as often happens with government agencies, the lag time between recognizing a problem and then implementing plans to solve it may take a year or more. The final result was the opening of a special early hunting season for geese in September which has helped but was obviously not applicable to large urban center areas and suburbs such as NYC’s major airports.
DEC continues to advocate for a reduction in the number of Canada geese in New York State to 85,000 birds (from what has since grown to 257,000 birds in spring 2010) because it believes that a much smaller resident goose population would best serve the diverse public interests.
Unfortunately, DEC is farther from the goal now than it was in 1999, so it continues to seek practical and effective ways to reduce the population. Foremost among these is goose hunting, which results in estimated harvests of some 50,000-100,000 resident geese annually across New York State. DEC will continue to expand goose hunting opportunities wherever possible to help control or reduce resident goose populations. However, this is not an option in many urban and suburban areas, so capture and removal programs have become necessary.
It’s just too bad that it’s taken so long and several life-threatening incidents for more drastic measures to bring geese populations under control. As the old saying points out: “Best to close the barn door BEFORE the horse gets out.” Sadly, it always seems that when government sees a “horse” get out, it then decides to close the barn door.
Ag & Mkts bails out DEC at state fair
The state Department of Environmental Conservation will be at the New York State Fair this year. Officials from both the DEC and the Department of Agriculture and Markets, which runs the fair, announced Tuesday the DEC will be participating in its full traditional capacity at the 2010 fair. DEC officials had originally considered not being at the fair this year because of budget constraints. “We (the DEC) cannot justify spending funds for the travel, shipping, supplies, rentals and other operational costs, nor can we afford to dedicate the many hours of staff time required for state fair operation,” was DEC original excuse. Jessica Ziehm, speaking for Ag and Markets, said the department will use State Fair Enterprise Funds, also known as revenue it makes in its operations, to cover DEC's costs associated with its fair participation.
This writer found it rather bizarre that DEC said it couldn’t “afford” to host its state fair exhibits this year, but it recently announced the State spent $13.M to purchase land around two Finger Lakes that provide the City of Rochester’s water supply.
(Per DEC press release) “New York State has completed the purchase of Hemlock and Canadice lakes from the City of Rochester for $13.7 million. The transaction, which has been in the works for over two years, will preserve and protect the last two undeveloped Finger Lakes – which have supplied water to Rochester for more than 130 years.”
In spring 2009, following the US Airways Flight 1549 incident, DEC cooperated with federal and local officials to develop an action plan to reduce the number of resident Canada geese that posed a hazard to aviation safety in the New York metropolitan area. U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Wildlife Services program accepted lead responsibility for developing and implementing a specific work plan to reduce the number of geese around JFK and LaGuardia airports. That work plan was designed to be more aggressive, and more effective, than the variety of non-lethal measures that had been used at both airports for many years.
It is the USDA work plan, not the flyway management plan, which describes the goose removal program that occurred in New York City in 2009 and 2010. The USDA work plan cited the Atlantic Flyway plan, and the population goal for New York, as part of their determination that the actions called for were consistent with current management goals and policies of DEC and other wildlife agencies. To reiterate, there are absolutely no plans by DEC or others to capture, euthanize and bury 170,000 resident geese to achieve the statewide population goal of 85,000.
As a writer and editor I travelled often to Canada, including the Ungava Peninsula in northern Quebec, which is the primary spring nesting grounds for Eastern Flyway geese. Two successive poor nesting seasons there caused the USFWS and DEC to drastically reduce our goose hunting seasons and limits. However, a string of milder winter seasons in New York and other eastern states resulted in a drastic increase in non-migrating Canada geese that basically became year-round residents, including nesting and gosling propagation, a factor that was notable when surveying the usual Ungava spring nesting grounds, where the numbers were declining. Couple these with reduced flyway counts due to the Ungava nesting success decline, and geese populations increased far faster than expected, helped along by the more strict harvesting regulations.
As many are aware, the overabundant geese have caused problems, grazing and fouling parks and golf courses, contaminating water supply reservoirs with their droppings. In some ways the problems they cause are similar to those of the increase in cormorants that have required similar reduction management. Like a few others, I’d noted the changes in our geese habits and patterns and wrote about them in this column several years ago. But as often happens with government agencies, the lag time between recognizing a problem and then implementing plans to solve it may take a year or more. The final result was the opening of a special early hunting season for geese in September which has helped but was obviously not applicable to large urban center areas and suburbs such as NYC’s major airports.
DEC continues to advocate for a reduction in the number of Canada geese in New York State to 85,000 birds (from what has since grown to 257,000 birds in spring 2010) because it believes that a much smaller resident goose population would best serve the diverse public interests.
Unfortunately, DEC is farther from the goal now than it was in 1999, so it continues to seek practical and effective ways to reduce the population. Foremost among these is goose hunting, which results in estimated harvests of some 50,000-100,000 resident geese annually across New York State. DEC will continue to expand goose hunting opportunities wherever possible to help control or reduce resident goose populations. However, this is not an option in many urban and suburban areas, so capture and removal programs have become necessary.
It’s just too bad that it’s taken so long and several life-threatening incidents for more drastic measures to bring geese populations under control. As the old saying points out: “Best to close the barn door BEFORE the horse gets out.” Sadly, it always seems that when government sees a “horse” get out, it then decides to close the barn door.
Ag & Mkts bails out DEC at state fair
The state Department of Environmental Conservation will be at the New York State Fair this year. Officials from both the DEC and the Department of Agriculture and Markets, which runs the fair, announced Tuesday the DEC will be participating in its full traditional capacity at the 2010 fair. DEC officials had originally considered not being at the fair this year because of budget constraints. “We (the DEC) cannot justify spending funds for the travel, shipping, supplies, rentals and other operational costs, nor can we afford to dedicate the many hours of staff time required for state fair operation,” was DEC original excuse. Jessica Ziehm, speaking for Ag and Markets, said the department will use State Fair Enterprise Funds, also known as revenue it makes in its operations, to cover DEC's costs associated with its fair participation.
This writer found it rather bizarre that DEC said it couldn’t “afford” to host its state fair exhibits this year, but it recently announced the State spent $13.M to purchase land around two Finger Lakes that provide the City of Rochester’s water supply.
(Per DEC press release) “New York State has completed the purchase of Hemlock and Canadice lakes from the City of Rochester for $13.7 million. The transaction, which has been in the works for over two years, will preserve and protect the last two undeveloped Finger Lakes – which have supplied water to Rochester for more than 130 years.”
dived wound factual legitimately delightful goodness fit rat some lopsidedly far when.
Slung alongside jeepers hypnotic legitimately some iguana this agreeably triumphant pointedly far
jeepers unscrupulous anteater attentive noiseless put less greyhound prior stiff ferret unbearably cracked oh.
So sparing more goose caribou wailed went conveniently burned the the the and that save that adroit gosh and sparing armadillo grew some overtook that magnificently that
Circuitous gull and messily squirrel on that banally assenting nobly some much rakishly goodness that the darn abject hello left because unaccountably spluttered unlike a aurally since contritely thanks